42 USC 1985- Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights

I have claimed 42 USC 1985 since the beginning; it hits the nail on the head and here is why

42 USC 1985- Conspiracy to Interfere With Civil Rights

I'VE SAID IT HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THIS PROJECT. I WHOLEHEARTEDLY DOUBLE DOWN ON THAT

The Fraudulent Changing of Circuit Court Records x2

EVIDENCE OF FRAUD IN LAFAYETTE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT DOCUMENTED ON TWO SEPARATE INSTANCES OVER 1-YEARS TIME

Both instances involved the same initially assigned Circuit Court Judge Kent Smith which a short-time later mysteriously changed to Judge John Kelly Luther...
Nobody seems to have any response or explanation for the alarming discoveries made

Keep in mind this PROCESS is DESIGNED and put in place
TO PROVIDE FAIRNESS THROUGH THE RANDOM ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNED JUDGE VIA ALGORITHM

The First Documented instance in August of 2020. This was discovered prior to the presidential election and had occurred on my filed post conviction relief l20-316

The Second Documented instance Occurred in DECEMBER of 2021 in which asking questions in order to get some understanding came with disasterous, retaliatory consequences by lafayette county

Reardon Files Shocking LAST MINUTE motion with Court Of Appeals to Vacate Plea and Reverse Original Judgement in 2017 Criminal Case

In 2017 he was banished from Oxford, MS and Lafayette County along with signing a Covenant to Not Sue the City, County, Sheriffs Department, Elected Officials, and Employees. Now In 2021, Matt Reardon AKA Oxford Outlaw files an absolutely shocking Last minute “One and Done” motion for Peremptory Reversal to the Mississippi Court of Appeals at 11:59pm on September 16th to vacate his plea made and reverse judgement and order of the original 2017 criminal charge!

Reardon files absolutely shocking Last minute “One and Done” motion for Peremptory Reversal to Mississippi Court of Appeals at 11:59pm to vacate plea and reverse judgement and order of original 2017 criminal charge!

Reardon’s Motion for Peremptory Reversal submitted just before midnight on 9/16/2021

COA-Motion-for-Peremptory-Reversal

MS Attorney General Lynn Fitch & Special AG Barbara Byrd issues response on 9/20/2021

state-response-to-peremptory-reversal

My Rebuttal to the Response from the State Attorney General’s Office

rebuttal-to-state-response-coa

A very concerning fact starts to show clearly when assessing the facts and the response given by the State Attorney General’s Office. Attorney General Lynn Fitch’s Office demonstrates a much higher interest, and clearly knowledge, in the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure than the Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure. This should never be the case! The rights of the accused should always be preserved and held at a much higher level at the trial stage so as not to completely violate the rights of an innocent citizen such as what happened with my particular case. When the Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure are completely violated and Due Process Rights of the accused are not afforded which in turn sways the outcome in a particular legal matter, that legal matter in turn should be viewed as VOID, even FRAUDULENT through manifest procedural error committed by the state making an appeal essentially pointless to fight by the State. In this particular case, you have the State AG’s office fighting to dismiss the appeal on technicality, but where is any type of responsibility taken for the major deprivation of essentially all due process rights which the state is mandated to provide under both State and Federal Law?

Straight into #BeastMode

42 US Code 1985- What it means to Lafayette County Sheriffs Department and others that have gone on Hiatus

Honestly It’s hard to imagine this statute applying more directly than with everything I have encountered from 2017 til today

Watch this 3 minute video to learn more about it. Be on the lookout next for a special interest piece on The Earlene Gardner Victims ASSistance Project; a DOJ funded project which through my own first-hand experience have witnessed completely fraudulent, falsifying, unethical, unscrupulous behavior for a “non-profit organization” that continues showing an insistence of operating in morally unsatisfying ways. I could create a page in itself that goes into great detail and I may just do that

Major Issues with 1st Amendment Infringement at the US Attorneys Office in Oxford, MS

A Renewed Demand for Justice and Accountability From Merrick Garland’s Department Of Justice

48-page-District-Court-Filing-4