Reardon Files Shocking LAST MINUTE motion with Court Of Appeals to Vacate Plea and Reverse Original Judgement in 2017 Criminal Case

In 2017 he was banished from Oxford, MS and Lafayette County along with signing a Covenant to Not Sue the City, County, Sheriffs Department, Elected Officials, and Employees. Now In 2021, Matt Reardon AKA Oxford Outlaw files an absolutely shocking Last minute “One and Done” motion for Peremptory Reversal to the Mississippi Court of Appeals at 11:59pm on September 16th to vacate his plea made and reverse judgement and order of the original 2017 criminal charge!

Reardon files absolutely shocking Last minute “One and Done” motion for Peremptory Reversal to Mississippi Court of Appeals at 11:59pm to vacate plea and reverse judgement and order of original 2017 criminal charge!

Reardon’s Motion for Peremptory Reversal submitted just before midnight on 9/16/2021

COA-Motion-for-Peremptory-Reversal

MS Attorney General Lynn Fitch & Special AG Barbara Byrd issues response on 9/20/2021

state-response-to-peremptory-reversal

My Rebuttal to the Response from the State Attorney General’s Office

rebuttal-to-state-response-coa

A very concerning fact starts to show clearly when assessing the facts and the response given by the State Attorney General’s Office. Attorney General Lynn Fitch’s Office demonstrates a much higher interest, and clearly knowledge, in the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure than the Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure. This should never be the case! The rights of the accused should always be preserved and held at a much higher level at the trial stage so as not to completely violate the rights of an innocent citizen such as what happened with my particular case. When the Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure are completely violated and Due Process Rights of the accused are not afforded which in turn sways the outcome in a particular legal matter, that legal matter in turn should be viewed as VOID, even FRAUDULENT through manifest procedural error committed by the state making an appeal essentially pointless to fight by the State. In this particular case, you have the State AG’s office fighting to dismiss the appeal on technicality, but where is any type of responsibility taken for the major deprivation of essentially all due process rights which the state is mandated to provide under both State and Federal Law?

Author: Matt Reardon

Matt Reardon is a 35 year old father of 4. As an independent investigative journalist and reporter, Reardon isn't afraid to venture where others have walked away

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *